Past Articles: Volumes 70-79

2021 - Volume 79

Issue 2 - Spring 2021

• Paul Hildebrandt, “Reconsidering the Income Tax Treatment of Investigation Fees” (2021) 79:2 UT Fac L Rev 207.

• Steve Novaković, “Shielded from Shame: Civil Immunity for Ontario's Long-Term Care Facilities in the Wake of COVID-19”  (2021) 79:2 UT Fac L Rev 257.

Issue 1 - Winter 2021

• Spence Colburn, “Presumed Compliant: Charter Review of Statutory Grants of Discretion & the Presumption of Constitutionality” (2021) 79:1 UT Fac L Rev 1.

2020 - Volume 78

Issue 2 - Spring 2020

• Sujung Lee, “Re-Evaluating Moral Culpability in the Wake of Gladue” (2020) 78:2 UT Fac L Rev 109.

• D’Arcy P White, “Business in the Middle Kingdom: An Evaluation of CFPOA Risk” (2020) 78:2 UT Fac L Rev 137.

Issue 1 - Winter 2020

• Adil Abdulla, “The Circumstances of Change: Understanding the Bedford/Carter Exceptions to Vertical Stare Decisis” (2020) 78:1 UT Fac L Rev 1.

• SJ Calum Agnew, “Rumours of Corruption: Referrals from the World Bank Sanctions System to National Law Enforcement Authorities” (2020) 78:1 UT Fac L Rev 23.

• Mitchel Fleming, “Fixing the Odds: Designing Intelligent Loot Box Policy in the Canadian Context” (2020) 78:1 UT Fac L Rev 74.

2019 - Volume 77

Issue 2 - Spring 2019

• Joanne Cave, “From Rights Recognition to Reconciliation: Reflecting on the Government of Canada's Proposed Indigenous Rights Recognition Framework” (2019) 77:2 UT Fac L Rev 59.

• Justin P’ng, “The Gatekeeper's Jurisdiction: The Law Society of Ontario and the Promotion of Diversity in the Legal Profession” (2019) 77:2 UT Fac L Rev 82.

• Brett Carlson, Samuel Bogetti & Noah Burshtein, “The Foreign Fighter Crisis: A Renewed Canadian Approach” (2019) 77:2 UT Fac L Rev 108.

• Jeffrey Wyngaarden, “Life after Death: Post-Mortem Claims under Section 7 of the Charter” (2019) 77:2 UT Fac L Rev 137.

• Ryan Nicholas Howes, “A Right to Choose: A Critical Review and Defence of the Minimum Performance Principle” (2019) 77:2 UT Fac L Rev 164.

Issue 1 - Winter 2019

• Kent Williams, “How the Charter Can Protect Indigenous Spirituality; Or, the Supreme Court's Missed Opportunity in Ktunaxa Nation” (2019) 77:1 UT Fac L Rev 1.

• Mark Luimes, “Fitness to Plead Guilty: The Limited Cognitive Capacity Test and Mentally Disordered Accused” (2019) 77:1 UT Fac L Rev 27.

• Kerry Sun, “The Notion of a Proportionate Balance: A Book Review” (2019) 77:1 UT Fac L Rev 44.

2018 - Volume 76

• Natasha Novac, “Waiver: A Feminist Analysis of Charge Bargaining in Sexual Assault Prosecution in Ontario” (2018) 76:1 UT Fac L Rev 1.

• Chantelle van Wiltenburg, “Off the Record: A Critical Analysis of Youth Record Disclosure Practices” (2018) 76:1 UT Fac L Rev 29.

• Nigel Grenier, “Esdii Wal: Gitxsan Law Grounded in Epistemology” (2018) 76:1 UT Fac L Rev 64.

• James Boyd, “Collateral Benefits: Defending the Causal Rationale” (2018) 76:1 UT Fac L Rev 92.

• E Samuel Farkas, “Araya v Nevsun and the Case for Adopting International Human Rights Prohibitions into Domestic Tort Law” (2018) 76:1 UT Fac L Rev 130.

2017 - Volume 75

Issue 2 - Spring 2017

• Brian Studniberg, “The Uncertain Scope of the De Facto Director Doctrine” (2017) 75:2 UT Fac L Rev 69.

• Misha Boutilier, “From Seal Welfare to Human Rights, Can Unilateral Sanctions in Response to Mass Atrocity Crimes Be Justified under the Article XX(A) Public Morals Exception Clause” (2017) 75:2 UT Fac L Rev 101.

• Reem Zaia, “Access to State Secrets in Terrorism Prosecutions: A Case Comment on R v Alizadeh and the Structures of Third Party Disclosure” (2017) 75:2 UT Fac L Rev 129.

Issue 1 - Winter 2017

• Theodore Milosevic, “What Makes a Consumer: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and Free Digital Services in Canada” (2017) 75:1 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Samuel Greene, “Attorney General of Canada v Rapiscan Systems Inc: Reflections on the Challenge of Judicial Review in Government Procurement” (2017) 75:1 UT Fac L Rev 48.

2016 - Volume 74

• Veenu Goswami, “Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Order by Lindsay Farmer” (2016) 74:1 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Craig Mazerolle, “Crafting an Aboriginal Labour Law” (2016) 75:1 UT Fac L Rev 18.

• Andrew Mihalik, “Golden Leash Arrangements: A Legal and Policy Analysis” (2016) 74:1 UT Fac L Rev 49.

2015 - Volume 73

Issue 2 - Spring 2015

• Jeremy Drucker, “Panel Composition at the Court of Appeal for Ontario” (2015) 73:2 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Robert Dül, “Grassy Narrows X: An Alternative Argument” (2015) 73:2 UT Fac L Rev 32.

• Ted Brook, “Judicial Review of Modern Municipalities: Rethinking Vires Review” (2015) 73:2 UT Fac L Rev 66.

• Sean Husband, “Chinese Comfort Women by Peipei Qui” (2015) 73:2 UT Fac L Rev 97.

Issue 1 - Winter 2015

• Daniella Murynka, “Some Problems with Killing the Legislator” (2015) 73:1 UT Fac L Rev 11

• Lawrence David, “Resource Allocation and Judicial Deference on Charter Review: The Price of Rights Protection according to the McLachlin Court” (2015) 73:1 UT Fac L Rev 35.

• Mark Coombes, “Book Review: Why Law Matters by Alon Harel” (2015) 73:1 UT Fac L Rev 63.

• Rachel Charney, “Can Androids Plead Automatism - A Review of When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence under the Criminal Law by Gabriel Hallevy” (2015) 73:1 UT Fac L Rev 69.

2014 - Volume 72

Issue 2 - Spring 2014

• Violeta Solonova Foreman, “Non-Binding Preliminary Agreements: The Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith and the Award of Expectation Damages” (2014) 72:2 UT Fac L Rev 12.

• Eric Monkman, “A New Approach to the Consideration of Collateral Consequences in Criminal Sentencing” (2014) 72:2 UT Fac L Rev 38.

• William A Muir, “Class AMPs: Withdrawing the Corporate Veil on Judgment Proofing” (2014) 72:2 UT Fac L Rev 75.

• Matthew Snyder, “A Commentary on Ontario Poison Pill Regulation: Moving Towards a Permitted Bid Mechanism” (2014) 72:2 UT Fac L Rev 107.

Issue 1 - Winter 2014

• Nicola J Langille, “Forgetting Youth: The Use of Prior Youth Records to Impugn Credibility” (2014) 72:1 UT Fac L Rev 10.

• Olga Redko, “Religious Practice as a Thin Skull in the Context of Civil Liability” (2014) 72:1 UT Fac L Rev 38.

2013 - Volume 71

Issue 2 - Spring 2013

• Hannah Freeman, “The Presumption of Jury Competence: Sarrazin's New Acknowledgement of Cognitive Biases and Its Implications for Counsel” (2013) 71:2 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Gordon T Houseman, “Advance Notice Provisions: Oppression and the Public Interest” (2013) 71:2 UT Fac L Rev 28.

• Kevin P Siu, “Technological Neutrality: Toward Copyright Convergence in the Digital Age” (2013) 71:2 UT Fac L Rev 76.

• Tony Drake & Fidelia Ho, “The Year in Review 2012” (2013) 71:2 UT Fac L Rev 113.

Issue 1 - Winter 2013

• Gordon T Houseman, “Wrongful Birth as Negligent Misrepresentation” (2013) 71:1 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Tamara S Nachmani, “To Each His Own: The Case for Unilateral Determination of Public Morality under Article XX(A) of the Gatt” (2013) 71:1 UT Fac L Rev 31.

• Stephen Aylward, “The Idea of Privacy Law: Jones v Tsige and the Limits of the Common Law” (2013) 71:1 UT Fac L Rev 61.

2012 - Volume 70

Issue 2 - Spring 2012

• Ian Kennedy, “Practice Makes Custom: A Closer Look at the Traditional Law of Naval Blockade” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 10.

• Benjamin Oliphant, “Exiting the Freedom of Association Labyrinth: Resurrecting the Parallel Liberty Standard under 2(D) & Saving the Freedom to Strike” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 36.

• Michael Podolny, “The Limits of Sovereign Immunity: A Study and Analysis of the Canadian Income Taxation of Sovereign Wealth Funds” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 90.

• Douglas Sarro, “Breaking the Bargain: A Comment on the Constitutional Validity of Bill C-7, the Proposed Senate Reform Act” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 115.

• Akash Toprani, “A Tale of Two Section Twenty-Fours: Towards a Comprehensive Approach for Charter Remedies” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 141.

• Marc Gibson & Kai Sheffield, “2011 Year in Review: Constitutional Developments in Canadian Criminal Law” (2012) 70:2 UT Fac L Rev 167.

Issue 1 - Winter 2012

• Joshua Krusell, “Are National Class Actions Constitutional; A Reply to Walker, Hogg and McKee” (2012) 70:1 UT Fac L Rev 9.

• Denise Cooney, “An Absence of Reason: Why the Supreme Court of Canada Should Justify Dismissing Applications for Leave to Appeal” (2012) 70:1 UT Fac L Rev 41.